Wednesday, 30 June 2010
The On-Song Unsung
Tuesday, 29 June 2010
Crossed The Line - Dave Henson
Thursday, 24 June 2010
Anyone For Tennis? No?
Furnish'd and burnish'd by Aldershot sun,
What strenuous singles we played after tea,
We in the tournament - you against me!
Sunday, 20 June 2010
A World Cup Highlight - 1998
Wednesday, 16 June 2010
The Vuvuzela Song
Tuesday, 15 June 2010
Battle of the World Cup Minnows: Slovakia vs New Zealand
Scrolling through the World Cup games before the tournament started I picked out New Zealand vs Slovakia as the least interesting in the finals. So I thought I’d watch it, in its entirety.
Sometimes the least hyped games turn out to be the best and I could find myself pleasantly surprised. Who would come out on top in the battle of the World Cup minnows?
The Slovakian team contains some players of renown – Stanislav Sestak scored six goals in World Cup qualifying and Marek Hamsik is coveted by some of Europe’s biggest clubs. But it was the Kiwis I was more interested in seeing.
That their side contained players who turned out for AFC Wimbledon, Worksop and Yeading in their time tells you all you need to know about the All Whites. And what is it with Kiwi sides and their colour-themed nicknames? Urban myth or otherwise, the New Zealand shuttlecock team are known as “the Black C**ks”. I daren’t try and verify it on Google.
As the national anthems struck up I dearly hoped this would be the only time when the sides weren’t on song. The first half hour didn’t fill me with confidence, however, and it was defined by shanked clearances, over hit free kicks and shots blasted high and wide.
As a consequence, my mind wandered away from the football and onto lookalikes. I had to double take when I saw Martin Skrtel, who I was convinced was Wentworth Miller from ‘Prison Break’, and New Zealand’s Simon Elliot is a dead-ringer for Art Garfunkel. Apparently he is penning a song about his search for England's no.21 in the Rainbow Nation: For Emile, Whenever I May Find Him.
Slovakia began to get a foothold in the game with Vladimir Weiss and Hamsik looking to have more quality than their opponents. Both were involved in a clever free-kick routine in the 43rd minute with Mark Paston palming Hamsik’s shot over the bar.
The European team eventually opened the scoring through Robert Wittek with a strike which will certainly not feature in the ‘Goal of the Tournament’ competition. “A bread and butter goal” was BBC commentator Martin Keown’s accurate description.
At this point, the game entered a lull with few meaningful chances. Weiss was denied by a last-ditch tackle by Winston Reid after a decent move, and the Kiwi Shane Smeltz – who I’m sure had a tough time of things at school – missed a decent chance at the other end.
Then in the 93rd minute – drama! The Slovakian defence, thinking they had the game won, switched off and Winston Reid nipped in and scored with a header. The Kiwis had secured a point they barely deserved, their first in World Cup history.
Was it drama enough to leave me pleasantly surprised as I had hoped? I would say "no". Like many a match at these finals it was a disappointment, with New Zealand looking like a limited side and Slovakia looking good, but not quite good enough to break down a well-drilled outfit.
Oh well, Chile play Honduras at the same time tomorrow.
Monday, 14 June 2010
A Word In Your Ear, Fabio
So we drew 1 – 1 against the USA. It’s not the end of the world. Our opponents were an experienced side, well organised by Bob Bradley, and currently lie fourteenth in the world rankings.
And it’s unrealistic for a team to play quality football throughout an international tournament. In 2008, the Dutch played scintillating football before coming unstuck at the quarter-final stage against an Arshavin-inspired Russia. A disappointing result – and ours wasn’t even a defeat – gives a coach an opportunity to reflect on the game and remedy what went wrong.
That said, the notion of Capello as an infallible being was dealt a severe blow on Saturday. If I had the opportunity to bend Fabio’s ear I would make the following five suggestions to get us back on track:
GET RID OF EMILE: Heskey probably outplayed Rooney on Saturday but England’s forward line ain’t big enough for the both of them. Wayne has evolved as a footballer over the last couple of years with Ferguson honing him into a predator supreme, which explains his record of 34 goals in 44 games this season. Compare his run of excellent headed goals with his pathetic headed effort in the second half and you see how important it is to give him the platform to do what he’s been doing all season for United.
DISPENSE WITH STEVE’N’FRANK: How many times do you try something before you admit it doesn’t work? It seemed the first thing Capello accepted when he took the position of England manager was that these two can’t play together. And yet for the biggest game of his reign he changes his mind.
Lampard, the man who orchestrated Chelsea’s remarkable end to the season was reduced to babysitting Steven Gerrard, for whom the term ‘headless chicken’ – albeit one who’s good at football – springs to mind.
PLAY GERRARD ON THE LEFT OF MIDFIELD: Ah, the infamous Left Midfield. A position no Englishman dare tread. And yet Ronaldinho, Zidane and Cristiano Ronaldo have all made a pretty good fist of it in recent years – so why not Gerrard? Perhaps the problem isn’t so much that Gerrard lacks the technique to play there, more that he doesn’t have the humility to give it a good go.
PLAY DAWSON: It may be that Capello’s World Cup defensive picks are his nadir as England manager. His decision to choose King has come back to haunt him; Ferdinand, clearly not 100% fit, was always going to be susceptible to another injury; and Carragher’s loss of pace was palpable against the USA.
The best defensive partnerships tend to follow the rule of one combative player combined with one who has pace – think Terry/Gallas, Hyppia/Henchoz, Toure/Campbell. Being the only player left with any pace to call upon Dawson could have the opportunity to stake a claim he never thought possible a few months ago.
GET RID OF 4-4-2: I would be interested to know how many sides in the World Cup are playing a Bore-4-2 system. I suspect very few, yet the English still do. It is an out-dated formation which asks far too much of your left and right midfield and often leaves your midfield vulnerable after your wide men have pushed forward.
A 4-5-1 / 4-3-3 offers both greater assurance in defence and would be far more effective going forward, with Rooney and Lampard benefiting in particular.
Look, I’m not entirely writing off England’s chances of winning the World Cup, and there were some useful performances at the weekend – Terry, Johnson, Cole, Lennon, for instance. It’s just a question of shifting the chess pieces around the board a little, and who knows what will happen.
So my chosen team to face Algeria next Friday would be as follows, in a 4-3-3 formation: James – Johnson, Terry, Dawson, Cole – Barry, Milner, Lampard – Gerrard, Rooney, Lennon.